what a feeling kelly rowland album artwork
images dresses hot kelly rowland
rpat1968
08-07 06:46 PM
Interesting news posting today in "Dallas Morning News" :
http://www.competeamerica.org/news/media_coverage/2006_08/20060807_visapolicies.html
Have you guys seen the letters written by Compete America Board to US Senators and Congressmen. The points they talk about are very similar to the issues identified by us. You may browse the section when you have some time. The link is
http://www.competeamerica.org/hill/letter_congress/index.html
http://www.competeamerica.org/news/media_coverage/2006_08/20060807_visapolicies.html
Have you guys seen the letters written by Compete America Board to US Senators and Congressmen. The points they talk about are very similar to the issues identified by us. You may browse the section when you have some time. The link is
http://www.competeamerica.org/hill/letter_congress/index.html
wallpaper Kelly Rowland – What A Feeling
ivgclive
06-15 11:34 AM
My AP was approved while my wife's it was denied with reason "there is no pending I-485". My PD is 22 Nov 05 which is not yet current so I don't understand why they denied derivative spouses petition while mine was approved. We had an interview back in January and everything went on well there. Did anyone have similar issue? What are my options? I do not want to spend money and file for motion to reopen.
Thank you.
Did you send copy of I-485 receipt of her petition on the supporting document package?
Thank you.
Did you send copy of I-485 receipt of her petition on the supporting document package?
Datter
June 15th, 2005, 08:02 PM
Although the disembodied lizard foot might be a bit distracting, I think the photo might be improved if it were horizontally flipped.
2011 tattoo Kelly Rowland - When
dallasdude
03-26 01:53 PM
Correct. They are being heavily scrutinized now.
more...
nixstor
06-29 11:05 PM
Fresh off the death of S 1639, No one on the Hill wants to talk about immigration related bills
aroranuj
07-14 12:35 PM
Hello,
Can someone give me a brief idea as to how long it takes for the USCIS to respond to an MTR? I think I read somewhere that they respond within 60 days. Is that accurate? My MTR was filed 2 months back & I have not yet heard back from the USCIS. It was filed at TSC.
Thanks,
Can someone give me a brief idea as to how long it takes for the USCIS to respond to an MTR? I think I read somewhere that they respond within 60 days. Is that accurate? My MTR was filed 2 months back & I have not yet heard back from the USCIS. It was filed at TSC.
Thanks,
more...
HV000
02-14 10:11 PM
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) Ombudsman's office recently released a recommendations status chart (PDF 181KB) of all of the formal and Annual Report recommendations made to the USCIS since the establishment of the CIS Ombudsman's Office in July 2003. This chart also includes a summary of the USCIS's response and any implementation of a recommendation.
Here is the link:
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb_recommendations_to_uscis_status_chart.pdf
Here is the link:
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb_recommendations_to_uscis_status_chart.pdf
2010 Kelly Rowland released the
josecuervo
06-22 03:53 PM
thanks all for answering
more...
rodnyb
03-03 01:12 PM
http://kpkgs.com/files/The_Employment_Based_Green_Card_Process_and_the_Dr amatic_Negative_Impact_of_Country_Based_Quotas_on_ persons_of_Indian_Origin_Feb_20102.pdf
Anyone knows the background of this recapture? This is the first time I know congress had a law for it in 2000
Solution
The immediate solution is full accountability of all pending applicants for employment based immigrant visas both at USCIS and DOS. Without accurate data, it is difficult to hold the agencies accountable for their actions or inactions.
Another solution is to �recapture� lost visas. Between 1994 and 2006, USCIS underutilized the visa numbers by approving less than the 140,000 employment based applications each year even though USCIS had more than enough applications pending. Due to the statutory calculation method (explained more fully by USCIS and DOS on their websites), USCIS�s failure to timely process a sufficient number of applications resulted in the loss of approximately 349,000 visa numbers that could not be used in future years since the law prevents usage in future years. In 2000, Congress authorized the use of 130,000 these �lost� visa numbers by what has come to be known as the �visa recapture� method. However, approximately 219,000 numbers have not been �recaptured�. The current worldwide pending cases in all employment based categories is approximately 340,000 applicants. A one‐time recapture of the 219,000 unused visa numbers could go a long way to eliminating this backlog and bringing much needed relief to many applicants who currently face the prospect of becoming residents of the United States after they retire.
Anyone knows the background of this recapture? This is the first time I know congress had a law for it in 2000
Solution
The immediate solution is full accountability of all pending applicants for employment based immigrant visas both at USCIS and DOS. Without accurate data, it is difficult to hold the agencies accountable for their actions or inactions.
Another solution is to �recapture� lost visas. Between 1994 and 2006, USCIS underutilized the visa numbers by approving less than the 140,000 employment based applications each year even though USCIS had more than enough applications pending. Due to the statutory calculation method (explained more fully by USCIS and DOS on their websites), USCIS�s failure to timely process a sufficient number of applications resulted in the loss of approximately 349,000 visa numbers that could not be used in future years since the law prevents usage in future years. In 2000, Congress authorized the use of 130,000 these �lost� visa numbers by what has come to be known as the �visa recapture� method. However, approximately 219,000 numbers have not been �recaptured�. The current worldwide pending cases in all employment based categories is approximately 340,000 applicants. A one‐time recapture of the 219,000 unused visa numbers could go a long way to eliminating this backlog and bringing much needed relief to many applicants who currently face the prospect of becoming residents of the United States after they retire.
hair kelly rowland album cover.
spicy_guy
03-03 07:19 PM
New found childhood lover :-)
more...
ItIsNotFunny
10-31 04:28 PM
Is It Not Funny? It is not funny ItIsFunny!
I hope you sent mails.
I hope you sent mails.
hot makeup kelly rowland
Saralayar
08-11 03:06 PM
oh, i signed for my daughter aged 16
USCIS instruction say that if they can sign, they can sign the forms. Otherwise, you can sign and include signed by father or mother in front of the signature.
USCIS instruction say that if they can sign, they can sign the forms. Otherwise, you can sign and include signed by father or mother in front of the signature.
more...
house kelly rowland 2011 album
sprash
05-04 08:34 PM
*bump* ... anybody?
tattoo wallpaper Kelly Rowland
pappu
08-22 06:52 PM
Read the archives on AC21 and job change.
more...
pictures Kelly Rowland is fast becoming
iv6523
06-11 08:17 PM
Hello,
Can any of you throw some light on these
To my understanding, if one is maxing out 6 years of H-1B visa on Nov 30, 2009 and doesn't have a way of extending to the 7th year H-1B.Then he has to stay physically outside of USA for 1 year.
1.Does 1 year stay have to be in the home country only?
2.Can one come and visit USA for a month[June 2010] or so between Nov30,09 and Nov 30,2010.[Eg: Conference, interview]?
3.If answer is yes to 2, would one have to stay for another 1 year away from July 2010? or they can come back to US during Dec 2010, if they have a new H-1B job?
Inputs appreciated.
Thanks
Can any of you throw some light on these
To my understanding, if one is maxing out 6 years of H-1B visa on Nov 30, 2009 and doesn't have a way of extending to the 7th year H-1B.Then he has to stay physically outside of USA for 1 year.
1.Does 1 year stay have to be in the home country only?
2.Can one come and visit USA for a month[June 2010] or so between Nov30,09 and Nov 30,2010.[Eg: Conference, interview]?
3.If answer is yes to 2, would one have to stay for another 1 year away from July 2010? or they can come back to US during Dec 2010, if they have a new H-1B job?
Inputs appreciated.
Thanks
dresses Kelly looks amazing!
komaragiri
08-07 05:31 PM
I have a question on the receipt number. If we get the receipt number, does it mean "The application is accepted" (All the supporting documentation and fee are coorect)?
or
Are there any cases where receipt numbers is issued though the supporting documentation / fee is not correct?
If correct fee is not filed, application will be rejected.
or
Are there any cases where receipt numbers is issued though the supporting documentation / fee is not correct?
If correct fee is not filed, application will be rejected.
more...
makeup Will y#39;all be copping Kelly#39;s
suny_saini
08-05 12:18 AM
My case cannot be processed under CSPA, because the form I-824 was not filed within one year of the visa becoming available.
ACC TO SUBJECT: CHILD STATUS PROTECTION ACT: ALDAC #2
REF: (A) 02 STATE 163054 (B) 02 STATE 123775
-------
If the principal applicant adjusted status in the U.S. and a derivative is applying for a visa abroad to follow-to-join, then the date on which the derivative will be considered to have sought LPR status for purposes of satisfying CSPA Section 3 will generally be the date on which the principal (acting as the derivative beneficiary's agent) filed the Form I-824 that is used to process the derivative's following to join application. Therefore, in cases involving a derivative seeking to follow to join a principal who adjusted in the U.S., the derivative can benefit from the CSPA if the principal filed a Form I-824 for the beneficiary within one year of a visa becoming available (i.e., within one year of the case becoming current or petition approval, whichever is later). The instructions to Form I-485 (the adjustment application) advise aliens adjusting status in the U.S. who have derivatives abroad to file a Form I-824 for such derivatives, and the I-485 Form indicates that that Form I-824 can be filed simultaneously with the Form I-485
(READ MORE FROM http://guangzhou.usconsulate.gov/cspa.html )
I NEED HELP AND I THINK THERE IS ALWAYS AN ALTERNATIVE OF THINGS.
IS THERE ANY OTHER WAY ANY ANY ANY WAY???
CAN THEY APPROVE IF I REQUEST THEM ?
WHAT IS the way out?
ACC TO SUBJECT: CHILD STATUS PROTECTION ACT: ALDAC #2
REF: (A) 02 STATE 163054 (B) 02 STATE 123775
-------
If the principal applicant adjusted status in the U.S. and a derivative is applying for a visa abroad to follow-to-join, then the date on which the derivative will be considered to have sought LPR status for purposes of satisfying CSPA Section 3 will generally be the date on which the principal (acting as the derivative beneficiary's agent) filed the Form I-824 that is used to process the derivative's following to join application. Therefore, in cases involving a derivative seeking to follow to join a principal who adjusted in the U.S., the derivative can benefit from the CSPA if the principal filed a Form I-824 for the beneficiary within one year of a visa becoming available (i.e., within one year of the case becoming current or petition approval, whichever is later). The instructions to Form I-485 (the adjustment application) advise aliens adjusting status in the U.S. who have derivatives abroad to file a Form I-824 for such derivatives, and the I-485 Form indicates that that Form I-824 can be filed simultaneously with the Form I-485
(READ MORE FROM http://guangzhou.usconsulate.gov/cspa.html )
I NEED HELP AND I THINK THERE IS ALWAYS AN ALTERNATIVE OF THINGS.
IS THERE ANY OTHER WAY ANY ANY ANY WAY???
CAN THEY APPROVE IF I REQUEST THEM ?
WHAT IS the way out?
girlfriend Lately Kelly Rowland has been
BKY
09-23 03:25 PM
__________________________________________________ ________________________
When changing from EB3 to EB2 (same Employer), experience with the same employer is considered only when the job duties are >50% different from the existing job.
__________________________________________________ ________________________
What if you change the employer ?
We can apply in EB2 with not much difference in old job and new job ?
When changing from EB3 to EB2 (same Employer), experience with the same employer is considered only when the job duties are >50% different from the existing job.
__________________________________________________ ________________________
What if you change the employer ?
We can apply in EB2 with not much difference in old job and new job ?
hairstyles Kelly Rowland Poses Glam For
willigetagc
07-25 02:53 PM
phew! thanks all for the quick response
bkarnik
09-24 07:46 PM
please......
I got notices from CSC too yesterday. The notice has a receipt date of Sep. 18, 2007 and a notice date of Sep. 19, 2007. The notice says that my petition was filed at CSC which is not the correct service center and has been transferred to NSC. NSC will be getting back to me with action taken. The notice has no information regarding Priority date or Attorney inspite of having a approved I140 and G-28 form included in the petitions
I immediately contacted my Attorney. Turns out we had Fedexed the applications on July 20th to the NSC and was recieved at the NSC on July 23rd. According to the attorneys, NSC probably transferred applications across various service centers for data entry and these applications are now being transferred back to NSC. It is very likley that the actual receipts will be issued by NSC. To play it safe, my attorneys will be sending a letter to the NSC documenting this and requesting that they be sent the correspondence from hereon.
Hopefully, thats what it is. Have you asked your attorneys their opinion?
I got notices from CSC too yesterday. The notice has a receipt date of Sep. 18, 2007 and a notice date of Sep. 19, 2007. The notice says that my petition was filed at CSC which is not the correct service center and has been transferred to NSC. NSC will be getting back to me with action taken. The notice has no information regarding Priority date or Attorney inspite of having a approved I140 and G-28 form included in the petitions
I immediately contacted my Attorney. Turns out we had Fedexed the applications on July 20th to the NSC and was recieved at the NSC on July 23rd. According to the attorneys, NSC probably transferred applications across various service centers for data entry and these applications are now being transferred back to NSC. It is very likley that the actual receipts will be issued by NSC. To play it safe, my attorneys will be sending a letter to the NSC documenting this and requesting that they be sent the correspondence from hereon.
Hopefully, thats what it is. Have you asked your attorneys their opinion?
Sakthisagar
05-25 10:46 AM
I have stamped from Canada 3 times before. without any issue.
I do not know the situation today. If you have all the required documents ready
and You attorney has sent a copy of your H1 extension to PIMS office at Kentucky
(For all extension petition this is required) You can stamp at Canadian US consulate
without much issues. If PIMS is not updated then you have to be ready to stay at Canada
for 1 to 3 months. so be careful before taking decisions, especially nowadays.This is my understanding.
Same thing at Indian consulates. I
f the rules have changed Please enlighten me the folks who knows about it.
I do not know the situation today. If you have all the required documents ready
and You attorney has sent a copy of your H1 extension to PIMS office at Kentucky
(For all extension petition this is required) You can stamp at Canadian US consulate
without much issues. If PIMS is not updated then you have to be ready to stay at Canada
for 1 to 3 months. so be careful before taking decisions, especially nowadays.This is my understanding.
Same thing at Indian consulates. I
f the rules have changed Please enlighten me the folks who knows about it.
entrada de Vukahynew @ 17:44
0 comentarios
0 comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Suscribirse a Enviar comentarios [Atom]
<< Inicio